On June 30, 2008, Google quietly made one of the largest non announcements the organic search space has seen. It lacked the visibility of “No Luke, I am your Father”, but has elicited the same kind of response from all of the web geeks that I have given the information. For instance, one of our new media strategists, Mike D, said “WHAT!!? HOW!!?”. After a trip to snopes.com turned up nothing, we soon began furiously googling for keywords on full on flash sites to assess the impact. A search on “peasant quest” turned up the mostly flash Videlectrix game portfolio site. The peculiar thing is that similar searches on other game names did not return the site. So like any good team of computer geeks on a mission, we killed a few hours playing Duck Guardian instead of solving the mystery.

Everything we have been told about search engines is about to be flipped on its ear. WOW! Now Google can read and crawl your Flash .swf files, but do not expect Digital shops to start recommending that everything changes to Flash just yet.

While Google may be able to crawl flash the following questions are still shrouded in Googley secrecy

• How much of the site can Google crawl?
• Which pieces is Google indexing?
• What are the most important parts code wise?
• How will results be displayed in a Google search?
• Can Google take you to specific “pages” within a flash app?

Since paging within a Flash application is not as cut and dry as an HTML site, it is not clear that whether Google will be able to find specific pages within the application. In order to judge the impact, we will need Google to provide a text cache for a Flash site. This is unlikely to happen for until the other (hahaha what other?) engines catch up. Until then, it’s a whole lotta test and learn.

When talking to marketing managers, the subject of segmentation often comes up. The conversation can seem forced and usually takes a turn from casual talk about business to a certain bitter formality, probably because now we’re talking about data. These marketing managers have never tasted our variety of data! Theirs is all crunchy-creamy like the grubs on Fear Factor. Yuck!

Expensive : Complicated : Useless

These are words they have used to describe segmentation! Further investigation usually reveals that their segmentation study was conducted so long ago that no one really remembers why. In one case, some muckety-muck told a group of analysts to do it and so they did exactly what he told them to do. No one really knew why it was being done.

Of course then nosy consultants like me come along and ask the question. Why did you do this segmentation? What does it all mean? It used to shock me when they would say that “it’s just the way we have always done it”.

Segmentation is not about grouping data for the sake of grouping data. Segmentation should have purpose. It should be used to solve a particular problem. It is useful for determining sales regions/territories, marketing message and campaign optimization, risk management, web visitor behavior classification etc etc etc.
Read the rest of this entry »

Each morning when I come to work, I try to steal a few minutes of time to read four web comics. I have tried a bunch of others, but I find that these are the ones that give me a mental boost that kicks off my day in a way that caffeine cannot. In other words, “clever” is my morning drug of choice.

Looking at my LinkedIn network of over 200 people, most people have been at more than one organization. If you take a random sample and interview you are bound to hear politically correct stories like

• I wanted more money.
• I felt under appreciated.
• I did not get along with my boss.
• I found a better opportunity.

Or you might find out that the person felt like they had their soul sucked out by Dementor kisses. Glassdoor.com is the place to air their filthy laundry about employment experiences anonymously. Registered users can review their previous position and talk about the benefits and gotchas of the employment experience. Registered users can also see the salaries for various positions within the companies.
Read the rest of this entry »

During my first year at the agency, I had the pleasure of working with strategic mastermind, Justin Holloway, now with Dye, Holloway, Murray in London. We were working on a pitch and he was explaining the brand identity of Trader Joe’s. He summarized it as a company that sort of brings the epicurean delights of society to the common man.

Trader Joe’s specializes in being an affordable gourmet store. They eliminate the middle man by producing their own foods with vendor partners. If the food does not meet their quality standards, they have no problem with axing it or making it unavailable until they find a new partner. They carry very few brand names and will often carry a brand name until they can clone it to their standards (like Nutella). The shocking thing is that the industry average for product development is 9 months. Zara is rumored to be able to develop a product and get it to market in 2 weeks. When I first read about Zara, I thought not only is this a fantastic model, but it is a lot like Trader Joe’s.

Read the rest of this entry »

We rely on the Internet to do everything from communicating with our friends, families and colleagues to choosing a new cappucino maker. A good deal of the technology we provided for your webbing enjoyment is free, but supported software with guaranteed uptime generally does not exist without a revenue model (for long). Companies like Yahoo! and Google provide us with oodles of free tools without so much as having to say “Oh Toodles”. We know the juggernaut model. They sell ads and they roll in dough. So when people complain about Yahoo or Google tools being down, I am sympathetic because whether the notice it or not, those companies are earning money by having you as a user. But what about those that do not have a revenue model to speak of? Read the rest of this entry »

YASMMeT /yaz’ met/ 1. (acronym) yet another social media messaging tool

Plurk is the latest yasmmet. It’s clearly a “competitor” to the popular twitter system. Twitter essentially is an open version of popular instant messaging platforms like MSN Messenger and AOL Instant Messenger. Plurk has an opportunity to capture social market share, [Notice that I did not say anything about revenue share as neither currently has a revenue model to speak of] primarily because twitter is horrible about stability.

Plurk has had the benefit of watching twitter flop around like a fish on the beach, but twitter has a big head start. Plurk’s user interface is a lot different. Twitter’s advantage is that most of its users are already longtime instant messenger users and bloggers who understand the technology and have easily adopted and embraced its value proposition. Because Plurk takes a few times to get used to, it puts it at a huge disadvantage in a space where people will give you about 90 seconds before they decide if they want to pursue something– unless they get some of the Twitter elite to convert people.

Read the rest of this entry »

I love the UPS whiteboard campaign.

The ads are mesmerizing they are sticky and the creative does not get in the way of the message.
The timing is impeccable. Andy Azula, the artist in the ads and creative director for The Martin Agency, makes what he is doing look easy. The tongue-in-cheek humor has longevity and is the inspiration for some ridiculous youtube knockoffs.

The Martin Agency got almost everything right. The music is perfect. Nearly. You see, the band is called…

THE POSTAL SERVICE.

Was Mama Cass an inspiration for twitter? My 5 year old was singing this song the other day and I immediately thought of twitter. I find myself putting things on twitter just to see if someone else will identify with my references. Other times because I tweet just because I need to get something out of my head and move on. It’s not exactly singing, but the whole tweeting for tweeting’s sake is a lot like making your own kind of music.

[For the sake of this argument and because most of Chairman Jobs' propaganda supposes that PCs and Windows are synonymous, let's say that Mac and OS X are also interchangeable. When I mention UNIX/Linux, let's assume that they are running on Sun or Intel hardware and therefore, to Macists are also icky like PCs and therefore must be destroyed.]

In the June 2008 issue of Wired Magazine, reader and Apple Zealot Dan Luke of Portland, Oregon made one of the most preposterous statements since “The world is flat.” What he does not realize is that his flippant attitude is actually dangerous to his red delicious way of life.

He declared: “It’s simple. Apple doesn’t make garbage. Everyone else does. PCs don’t really work.”

Read the rest of this entry »